Monday 21 June 2021

Advertising has gone totally Woke

 

Mainstream Media Advertising and children's TV have gone totally Woke

Children's TV today!


The big multinational corporations are using openly LGBT themes for their adverts. It appears that nothing is safe from the LGBT appropriations, the word "Gay", the Rainbow, Pride (although pride has always been a sin), and now the whole month of June, all in the name of disordered sexual desires. The advertising world is replete with "Gay" advertising. From Renault to holidays in Spain everywhere there are homosexual themes.

One of the first to use homosexuals in their adverts was the Ikea "Dining Room" ad (in 1994) where two men talk about how great Ikea is for their life together etc. We had the disgusting Cadbury Creme Egg ad before last Easter, where two men eat a Creme Egg between them - at the same time. Cadburys also have the halal symbol on their products. Why do advertisers pander so much to the LGBT minority? The simple reason is that the "Gay" lobby, like the Muslim one, are expert bullies. If they are not bullying they are whining on how hard done by they are. And with the TV for the last fifty years promoting all things homosexual we now have the BBC telling us that "June is Pride month, it is a month dedicated to celebrating the LGBTQ+ communities all around the world". But what is Pride month all about? It's not about love, despite their latest slogan "Love is Love"; it's not about love between a man and a woman, the love that reflects God's love for his spouse the Church. No! It's about lust, disordered sexual activity. It's about the love of sin and pride in sin. The main stream media is ramming this down the throats of everyone and even children - especially children, destroying their innocence and preparing them for a life of sin, brainwashing them to accept and even participate in a dissipated lifestyle.

Children's TV full of LGBT themes

Virtually every TV show now has homosexual, lesbian or Trans characters. They are particularly targeting children, and remember Jesus said "It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin." However, Disney Channel, Nickelodeon, Cartoon, DreamWorks Animation, are deliberately targeting children with explicitly homosexual themes. One Children's cartoon called Blues Clues has a Nora's arch Pride Parade theme with all the animals waving rainbow flags with a song's lyrics sung by a drag queen that go:

 

 “This family has two mommies. They love each other so proudly and they all go marching in ... the ... big parade,”

The TV is worse than ever; children's TV is very damaging to children's innocence PROTECT CHILDREN FROM THE TV, ESPECIALLY SADLY CHILDREN'S TV!

It is our duty as Christians to show the world what true love really is; we must love the sinner but hate the sin - what do we mean by loving the sinner? It must be to come in contact with someone who is living a sinful life to try and help them out of that sin. This is true love, this is love is love, love is not disordered. Love is sacrifice, going that extra mile to save a soul, love is giving, love is a pure heart, for Jesus said “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God."

Thursday 17 June 2021

The 'Vaccine' and Irish bishops part 2

                   

Catholic Teaching and the 'Vaccine'


Bishop Strickland a true Shepherd 

continued...

Robert Bartholomew P.H.D. Is a medical sociologist, journalist and author, Honorary Senior Lecturer in the Department of Psychological Medicine University of Auckland. He has published over 60 academic papers. He writes for several journals, including Psychology Today. Official

                   He is an expert in fields such as mass hysteria and mass psychogenic illness and is frequently consulted by media during current events of sociological phenomena such as incidences of suspected mass hysteria or panic.

              Dr Robert Bartholomew has come up with the following observation;      

                 “Robert Bartholomew Ph.D…acknowledges that every death linked to the virus is tragic. However, what he is calling for, is a downplay in the way news is being reported, and that words such as "deadly," and "grave," being used so frequently during reporting, are doing nothing to quell the rising panic of the general public, and equally nothing to actually inform the world of the facts.

 He's asking people to have some perspective. Psychology Today reports that the symptoms are no worse that the yearly flu outbreak, which the world is already used to, and that it is killing the same demographic as the common flu; the elderly, and the vulnerable - those with preexisting underlying conditions, whose health is already threatened.

The report continues to clarify that Coronavirus has already been confirmed to be milder than SARS, and MERS, the other viruses which were wildly sensationalised by the press…

What Psychology Today concludes by saying, is that we really need to beware of social media. Don't be fooled by the click bait headlines. Don't be fooled by the pictures of medical workers in hazmat suits, as they treat patients, and misquoted and flawed reporting. They call for the public to remember a key question; how is this different from any previous outbreak? So far, no different, and the outcome of all of the others, is that they have been contained, and the press have moved on. It's best practice to find reliable sources for the most up-to-date information, and not get drawn into the mass media panic…

      Source. Lucy Wigley moms.com

         Your Excellency, In your Statement you say:

“Meanwhile, it is important for all of us to do our best to discern very carefully the reliability of any information that we find on social media,”

          Very true, Big Tech has completely censored any objectivity or debate against experimental vaccines. It has altered its algorithm for when a search is entered for vaccines, it suppresses any dissent from the official narrative, highlighting any dangers or questioning  the ethics of it.

         Fr Chad Ripperger, an exorcist priest in America has stated,

         “And this is the problem with some of the stuff coming out recently,” he added. “The real problem with COVID is there’s not sufficiently grave cause to be vaccinated for it…People are being brainwashed by the mainstream media; they’re constantly harping on this thing.”

Ripperger also commented on the modern phenomena of how people are losing the ability to even assess the gravity of situations, because they make decisions based upon emotions and are “literally in panic mode.”

“There has to be mass death in order for us to start using things that are gravely morally illicit in order to survive,” he continued. Since the death rate for COVID-19 is so slight “it is not something for which the health requirements suffice in my opinion.”

        On Oct 4th 2020 many epidemiologists and health specialists got together to respond to the brute force of lockdowns in their declaration known as the great Barrington declaration named after where it was signed. They have asserted:

            “Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.

 

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e.  the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.

 

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection… Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practised by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.”

 This declaration has been signed by 57,022 Doctors, Public Health Scientists, Health Specialists and Medical Practitioners.

 

            This is a small sample of specialists who have concluded that there is no deadly pandemic, no more deadly than any other year. We may safely conclude the same. Hence from what has been mentioned above this would blow a hole in one of the specified criteria of the 2005 Vatican statement                                 

             “, it is right to abstain from using these vaccines if it can be done without causing…the population as a whole, to undergo significant risks to their health.”… “Moreover, we find, in such a case, a. proportional reason, in order to accept the use of these vaccines in the presence of the danger of favouring the spread of the pathological agent,”.

             A former professor at the University of Virginia’s school of medicine Dr. David Martin, Ph.D pointed out that hospitals are not testing patients for influenza in his view because governments:

           “don’t want to admit the fact that the majority of people who are in hospital, who are sick and who are dying, are experiencing exactly the same thing that’s happened every year, which is influenza-like, flu-like and pneumonia-like illness.”  Source. Life site news (LSN)

            The Centre for disease control (CDC) have had to admit, the death rate for cov-sars2 is much in line with flu. According to the CDC, the case survival rate of COVID-19 in patients ages 0 – 19 is 99.997%, 99.98% in patients 20 – 49 years, and 99.5% in patients 50 – 69 years. This is unaided, that is without medical treatment. With medical treatment it, the death rate, is vastly reduced as I shall mention later on.

             Dr Deborah Birx one of the U.S. government crew, has said in a press conference in April 2020, anyone who dies with covid will be counted as a covid death. No wonder that in Colorado they are counting people who have died with gun shot wounds as covid deaths.

            Dr David Cuddihy was questioned by an oireachtas committee on covid death numbers when questioned, if someone went in to hospital with a heart attack and died of a heart attack and if they happened to have tested positive for covid would that be classified as a covid death? He responded, it would be counted as a covid death. When questioned why this was the case, he said they were told to count the numbers this way by the WHO. No more questions. Given the god like status given to the WHO, who could ask any more questions?

Thursday 10 June 2021

The 'Vaccine' and Irish bishops part 1

 

Catholic Teaching and the 'Vaccine'

·         From Prayer Crusader St Rita to the Irish Bishops

Greetings in our Lord Jesus Christ,

          Sometime ago you made a statement on receiving the corona virus, sars-cov-2  ‘vaccine’. In your statement on the experimental vaccine, though not saying it outright, it was certainly implicit that everybody including  Catholics,  should take the vaccine. From the moment the covid farce 19 news started hitting the airwaves it was clear that there was something amiss with this whole thing: the stoking of fear, of mis-information, of dis-information, of censorship of information, of the abuse of power of some holding an alternative agenda. This has continued on, unabated, even intensified since March 2020. I hope in this letter to show you that I respectfully disagree with you and why I disagree with you.

Your statement, as you say, is based on the statement made by the Vatican on Dec 2020, which drew from the statement from the Pontifical Academy of Life 2005, in a reply to Ms Debi Vinnedge who enquired as to the use of aborted babies’ remains in the Rubella vaccine. You may also be alluding to the statements made by the English and Welsh bishops made also in Dec 2020 where they selectively quote from the 2005 Vatican statement. The document from the pontifical academy 2005 is a fine document up to the point where, after finding that even though a vaccine has fetal remains in it, the writers state that it is wrong and then conclude that it is still ok to receive the vaccine.

    “, the use of vaccines whose production is connected with procured abortion constitutes at least a mediate remote passive material cooperation to the abortion, and an immediate passive material cooperation with regard to their marketing. Furthermore, on a cultural level, the use of such vaccines contributes in the creation of a generalized social consensus to the operation of the pharmaceutical industries which produce them in an immoral way.”

So how they got from saying this to saying it is morally acceptable is difficult to see. Be that as it may, even if we take this at face value we shall have a look at the taking of the sars-cov-2 experimental vaccine according to the points set out in the Vatican statements.

               Firstly, this statement by the Vatican is not a magisterial document. It is a body which can even have non-Catholic people working in it. It is not a sacred Congregation. So a Catholic is not bound by this statement.

     "The fact of the matter is, pontifical academies are very low in the scale of authority and even non-Catholics can be members. (And as it happens Some are and have even made pro-depopulation statements),  It's not a Sacred Congregation that has papal authority when upholding the perennial Magisterium Hence, its document on vaccines can be viewed as an informative opinion piece, nothing more.” ( Deacon Nick Donnelly)

      So a Catholic is not bound by this statement.

Even if we are to accept this Vatican statement let’s have a look at it and to see if according to its stipulations, it is ok to take experimental gene altering experimental therapy.

The first stipulation it makes is,

            “If persons are exposed to considerable dangers to their health, vaccines with moral problems pertaining to them may also be used on a temporary basis.”

Well is there a considerable danger to health?  We are told to look at the science and the science emphatically says, NO. we are not exposed to considerable danger. Numerous eminent physicians and medically related specialists have stressed this to be so:

            “the odds of the average person (unvaccinated) in this study cohort being hospitalized is 1/17,511 or 0.006 percent. The odds of such a person developing mild COVID, simply cold or flu symptoms, is 162/17,511 or 0.9 percent.


These are the odds of the average person coming down with COVID and are quite low. Is this worth shutting down large swaths of the economy for? Have we ever done that for seasonal flu?

 If you look at the entire study population of about 35,000, this many individuals would need to be vaccinated to keep one person out of the hospital. And that one would likely recover. That’s what the vaccine provides.”

Dr Brian Joondeph M.D., American thinker magazine commenting on FDA report on the Pfizer vaccine of 44,000 participants.

             Dr Martin Feeley, clinical director of the Dublin Midlands Hospital Group, has stated:

        “The number of deaths among recent cases is less than one in a thousand. This data reflects a disease much less severe than the average annual flu,”.   (Source, Digital Desk staff)

A group of over 200 German and Spanish doctors have set up an international investigation into Covid-19, called ‘The Covid-19 Extra-parliamentary Committee‘.’ They have stated ‘We don’t need to be anxious about covid-19 because it’s no different to the seasonal flu that we have every year.’

Source, Europe reloaded

             A group of doctors from Spain have got together to refute the disinformation surround covid. They have stated:

            We say to citizens: don’t be afraid, this virus is benign unless you are part of the at-risk populations. If the TV channels do the same thing with the flu, the numbers will be much higher than for the coronavirus! On average, television will report an average of 3 million cases and 2,000 deaths from the flu every day. And for tuberculosis, television will report an average of 30,000 cases and 5,000 deaths every day. The flu virus infects 1 billion people every year and kills 650,000, and tuberculosis infects 10.4 million people every year and kills 1.8 million.  Doctors for truth,  (Source, Europe Reloaded.)

             From an epidemiologist on the irrationality of reaction to covid,

            “I have never seen anything like this, anything anywhere near like this. I’m not talking about the pandemic, because I’ve seen 30 of them, one every year. It is called influenza… But I’ve never seen this reaction, and I’m trying to understand why.” —Dr Joel Kettner, professor of Community Health Sciences and Surgery at Manitoba University, Medical Director of the International Centre for Infectious Diseases;

           If we dissect the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) own statements it can be seen that covid isn’t is in line with flu deaths. This is what Kit Knightly has done,

 It’s a good expose and I will

Dr Michael Ryan has stated that about 10% of the world has been infected with covid on oct 5th 2020, trying to frighten us, the death toll then was just over 1,061,539 and the media used this to scare us and governments used it to justify lockdowns. The world has 7,800,000,000 on the planet which makes the covid death rate 0.014 which is the same as influenza rates which is 24 times lower than the WHO’s estimates of 3.4 % last March. Though this was used by the media to scare us. Did no-one in the media do the maths, they obviously didn’t want to. If we do the maths it should re assure that there is no deadly pandemic but scaremongering and grist for the mill for the media baying for lockdowns and leading to government capitulation to placate the media which led to severe lockdowns and disruptions of people’s lives. And now to experimental vaccines

               Dr Roger Hodkinson is a virologist, a Pathologist and was chairman of the Royal College of Physicians, Canada’s pathology committee, and is the chairman of a Biotechnology company in America. He had this to say on governments’ and media’s response to the so called deadly pandemic,

      “The bottom line is simply this: there is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians. It’s outrageous. This is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public. There is absolutely nothing that can be done to contain this virus, other than protecting older more vulnerable people. It should be thought of nothing more than a bad flu season.”

 “It’s politics playing medicine and that’s a very dangerous game.”

 “Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence based for their effectiveness whatsoever. Paper masks and fabric masks are simply virtue signalling.”

 “Social distancing is also useless because Covid is spread by aerosols which travel 30 metres or so before landing. Enclosures have had such terrible unintended consequences. Everywhere should be open tomorrow.“

 “Using the province’s own statistics, the risk of death under 65 in this province is 1 in 300,000. You’ve got to get a grip on this. The scale of the response that you’re undertaking with no evidence for it is utterly ridiculous.”

Doctor Roger Hodkinson.

                   Dr Simon Thornley a Public Health Physician, lecturer and researcher in the section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics states that covid is not much more serious than flu. He quotes the Ioannidis study done at Stanford university which states the same. He is also supported by

    “The Ioannidis study shows the death rate (for COVID-19) is only very marginally worse than the standard flu viruses that kill hundreds of sick and elderly New Zealanders every year.”

Simon Thornley, senior lecturer in epidemiology, University of Auckland. September 6, 2020. He is part of COVID Plan B, a group of six academics including three health science lecturers. The group has called for an end to COVID-19 lockdowns, arguing the risks of the virus have been overstated and lockdowns are more harmful than the virus itself.

To be continued...