Catholic Teaching and the 'Vaccine'
|Bishop Strickland a true Shepherd|
Robert Bartholomew P.H.D. Is a medical sociologist, journalist and author, Honorary Senior Lecturer in the Department of Psychological Medicine University of Auckland. He has published over 60 academic papers. He writes for several journals, including Psychology Today. Official
He is an expert in fields such as mass hysteria and mass psychogenic illness and is frequently consulted by media during current events of sociological phenomena such as incidences of suspected mass hysteria or panic.
Dr Robert Bartholomew has come up with the following observation;
“Robert Bartholomew Ph.D…acknowledges that every death linked to the virus is tragic. However, what he is calling for, is a downplay in the way news is being reported, and that words such as "deadly," and "grave," being used so frequently during reporting, are doing nothing to quell the rising panic of the general public, and equally nothing to actually inform the world of the facts.
He's asking people to have some perspective. Psychology Today reports that the symptoms are no worse that the yearly flu outbreak, which the world is already used to, and that it is killing the same demographic as the common flu; the elderly, and the vulnerable - those with preexisting underlying conditions, whose health is already threatened.
The report continues to clarify that Coronavirus has already been confirmed to be milder than SARS, and MERS, the other viruses which were wildly sensationalised by the press…
What Psychology Today concludes by saying, is that we really need to beware of social media. Don't be fooled by the click bait headlines. Don't be fooled by the pictures of medical workers in hazmat suits, as they treat patients, and misquoted and flawed reporting. They call for the public to remember a key question; how is this different from any previous outbreak? So far, no different, and the outcome of all of the others, is that they have been contained, and the press have moved on. It's best practice to find reliable sources for the most up-to-date information, and not get drawn into the mass media panic…
Source. Lucy Wigley moms.com
Your Excellency, In your Statement you say:
“Meanwhile, it is important for all of us to do our best to discern very carefully the reliability of any information that we find on social media,”
Very true, Big Tech has completely censored any objectivity or debate against experimental vaccines. It has altered its algorithm for when a search is entered for vaccines, it suppresses any dissent from the official narrative, highlighting any dangers or questioning the ethics of it.
Fr Chad Ripperger, an exorcist priest in America has stated,
“And this is the problem with some of the stuff coming out recently,” he added. “The real problem with COVID is there’s not sufficiently grave cause to be vaccinated for it…People are being brainwashed by the mainstream media; they’re constantly harping on this thing.”
Ripperger also commented on the modern phenomena of how people are losing the ability to even assess the gravity of situations, because they make decisions based upon emotions and are “literally in panic mode.”
“There has to be mass death in order for us to start using things that are gravely morally illicit in order to survive,” he continued. Since the death rate for COVID-19 is so slight “it is not something for which the health requirements suffice in my opinion.”
On Oct 4th 2020 many epidemiologists and health specialists got together to respond to the brute force of lockdowns in their declaration known as the great Barrington declaration named after where it was signed. They have asserted:
“Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.
As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.
The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection… Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practised by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.”
This declaration has been signed by 57,022 Doctors, Public Health Scientists, Health Specialists and Medical Practitioners.
This is a small sample of specialists who have concluded that there is no deadly pandemic, no more deadly than any other year. We may safely conclude the same. Hence from what has been mentioned above this would blow a hole in one of the specified criteria of the 2005 Vatican statement
“, it is right to abstain from using these vaccines if it can be done without causing…the population as a whole, to undergo significant risks to their health.”… “Moreover, we find, in such a case, a. proportional reason, in order to accept the use of these vaccines in the presence of the danger of favouring the spread of the pathological agent,”.
A former professor at the University of Virginia’s school of medicine Dr. David Martin, Ph.D pointed out that hospitals are not testing patients for influenza in his view because governments:
“don’t want to admit the fact that the majority of people who are in hospital, who are sick and who are dying, are experiencing exactly the same thing that’s happened every year, which is influenza-like, flu-like and pneumonia-like illness.” Source. Life site news (LSN)
The Centre for disease control (CDC) have had to admit, the death rate for cov-sars2 is much in line with flu. According to the CDC, the case survival rate of COVID-19 in patients ages 0 – 19 is 99.997%, 99.98% in patients 20 – 49 years, and 99.5% in patients 50 – 69 years. This is unaided, that is without medical treatment. With medical treatment it, the death rate, is vastly reduced as I shall mention later on.
Dr Deborah Birx one of the U.S. government crew, has said in a press conference in April 2020, anyone who dies with covid will be counted as a covid death. No wonder that in Colorado they are counting people who have died with gun shot wounds as covid deaths.Dr David Cuddihy was questioned by an oireachtas committee on covid death numbers when questioned, if someone went in to hospital with a heart attack and died of a heart attack and if they happened to have tested positive for covid would that be classified as a covid death? He responded, it would be counted as a covid death. When questioned why this was the case, he said they were told to count the numbers this way by the WHO. No more questions. Given the god like status given to the WHO, who could ask any more questions?