Friday, 15 October 2021

The 'Vaccine' and the Irish bishops part 4

 Another treatment offered by medical professionals is ivermectin

Drs Paul Marik and Pierre Kory founders of the group Front line covid critical care alliance (FLCCC alliance) have been promoting ivermectin which is normally used for parasite infestations of the body. They have been having promising results with this drug.

 Marik “the Eastern Virginia Medical School professor and doctor goes on to review four clinical studies (also chronicled by TrialSite) including Mahmud, Rajter, Kahn, and Gorial and performs what he describes as a “meta-analysis” with mortality as an endpoint. He argues that the results indicate a “highly significant reduction in mortality.” Trialsite news

           Last month Dr. Kory and his team testified before the U.S. Senate Homeland Security Committee in favour of authorizing ivermectin, a Nobel Prize–winning  anti-parasitic agent, for early treatment of the novel coronavirus.  In his impassioned presentation, Dr. Kory explained that ivermectin “basically obliterates transmission of this virus,” with “miraculous effectiveness.”

Ivermectin has been the subject of dozens of studies and anecdotal success stories since it was found to reduce COVID-19 in a laboratory last June.

          “I've been treating COVID pretty much every single day since the onset,” Kory said at the December hearing.

“When I say ‘miracle’ I do not use that term lightly[.] ... [T]hat is a scientific recommendation based on mountains of data that has emerged in the last three months.”

 

Such data emanates from places like India, the second most populated nation in the world, which embraced the treatment protocol advanced by FLCCC, and has watched its case and fatalities rate drop in “steep decline.”  Though India has four times the population of the U.S., it has less than half of the coronavirus related deaths.  Source LSN

              According to Dr Ryan Cole, Medical Director of Cole Labs, who says, four billion doses of Ivermectin have safely been taken. With Ivermectin the death rate decreased 70-90% in hospitals treating COVID-19 patients.

              The American National institute of health (NIH) has been implacably against this drug. One wonders why?              

Remdesivir another drug on the market shows effectiveness against sars-cov2, the New England journal of medicine reports on trials of Remdesivir shows that it was better than placebo and shortened hospitalization time and also reduced respiratory tract infections.

             The Medical Express reports on a 31 year old man who was quite ill with a rare genetic disorder which prevented him from creating immune antibodies and contracted the sars-cov2:

             “Dr. Nicholas Matheson from the Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease (CITIID) at the University of Cambridge added: "Our patient's unusual condition gave us a rare insight into the effectiveness of remdesivir as a treatment for coronavirus infection. The dramatic response to the drug—on repeated challenge—suggests that it can be a highly effective treatment, at least for some patients."

 

The team further suspect that remdesvir is likely to be most beneficial when administered early in infection, before the virus is able to trigger a potentially catastrophic immune response. They say that the course of their patient's disease also underscores the important—but often conflicting—roles that antibodies play in protecting us from infection.

 

"The fact that our patient was unable to fight off the disease without treatment suggests that antibodies contribute to the control of SARS-CoV-2," explained Dr. Matthew Buckland from the Department of Clinical Immunology, Barts Health, London. "But this lack of antibodies may also have prevented his COVID-19 from becoming life-threatening, because he had no antibodies to trigger a damaging immune response.”

 

             Prelimininary tests by Gilead the drug manufacturers have shown in a phase three simple trial, “Among severely sick people, the antiviral drug reduced the risk of dying by 62 percent compared with standard care,”

        Which of course requires to be confirmed in clinical trials.

         Other trials have found the same results such as that among severely sick people, the antiviral drug reduced the risk of dying by 62% compared with standard care,

                 Dr Kathleen Mullane of Chicago university, an infectious disease specialist, has said good things about it. On studies she has done on it she has stated that most of the patients under her care were severely ill with sars-cov2 but with treatment with the drug they were able to go home within six days and only two had died.

                   Remdesivir has also shown good results in many animal studies and shown that it can prevent and treat sars-cov-2, and mers.

                   One wonders why the WHO have said they do not recommend this drug.

                    Tocilizumab has also shown promising results especially in people who are in the severely ill category. In one trial in India one doctor had this to say,

            “The trial's lead co-author, Professor A. V. Ramanan from the University of Bristol's School of Clinical Sciences, and Consultant Paediatric Rheumatologist at Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, said: "Our study suggests tocilizumab might still be effective in patients with severe COVID-19 and so should be investigated further in future studies. It adds to existing evidence from the RECOVERY and REMAP-CAP studies which demonstrate that tocilizumab does have a significant impact on reducing mortality in those with COVID-19 requiring oxygen or being ventilated. After dexamethasone (steroids), this is still the most significant advance in the treatment of COVID that has an impact in reducing deaths." Source (Medical Express March 8th 2021)

   There are also ongoing trials with many other drugs that have not used murdered babies to obtain them.

Why would the relevant Government agencies be downplaying the potency of these very apt medicines and nature’s own immunity and healing properties? Might it have something to do with the fact that these agencies cannot legally allow on to the market an experimental vaccine where there is already a known treatment.

Hence the response to the Vatican statement where it states: “Therefore, doctors and fathers of families have a duty to take recourse to alternative vaccines… there is a grave responsibility to use alternative vaccines.”  This is not being adhered to and also falls at this fence.

Conscience

The recent statement from the Vatican following on from the 2005 statement states,

         “Due to the situation of the ongoing pandemic, “all vaccinations recognized as clinically safe and effective can be used in good conscience with the certain knowledge that the use of such vaccines does not constitute formal cooperation with the abortion from which the cells used in production of the vaccines derive.”

In assessing the ethics and the morality of a vaccine one criterion is whether the vaccine is more dangerous than the disease? Well I must say personally I have not the slightest fear of the novel coronavirus. Let’s take a look.  Surely one should weigh up the matter. Bishop Doran, you may have been influenced by Pope Francis when he said “we must take the vaccine. “ When he was interviewed on the Italian news media he said,

        "If the doctors are presenting this to you as a thing that will go well and doesn't have any special dangers, why not take it?"

        These are serious words coming from the pope, one wonders if he has done any research.

Sunday, 26 September 2021

Video for CUT and the Crusade of Prayer



A video for CUT and the Crusade of Prayer for the season of Michaelmas, as St Michael the Archangel and Our Lady of Good Counsel are the patrons of CUT (Catholics Unplug your Televisions) and the Crusade of Prayer. We are a media study group who look at film and TV from a Catholic perspective.
Also members of CUT and the Crusade of Prayer have helped fund a new production for EWTN called Christendom. This programme shows how the Catholic Church helped form Western Civilisation. The programme is almost finished and this is a video and new on the project.

Thursday, 16 September 2021

Bungling Biden and Belligerent Bergoglio


World civilisation in trouble?

 At a time when the world needs strong and sensible leadership we have a bungling left-liberal president of the USA, the most powerful democracy in the world, and a belligerent left-liberal pope who seems to do nothing but undermine the teachings of the Church. 

Let us look at the pope first because he is more important than any secular world leader. Just before the Covid pandemic started he enshrined the Pachamama pagan idol in St Peter's basilica after it had been worshipped in the Vatican gardens. He then condoned civil same-sex unions (or rather a video documentary had him doing so even though it was edited, but the Vatican did not contradict it). He continues to support things politically correct, then just recently started to undermine the most important work of his predecessor Pope Benedict XVI to restore the Traditional Latin Mass. Could it be more than a coincidence that the Covid 19 pandemic started soon after the satanic Pachamama incident and in China? He had of course made a secret deal with the Chinese Communist Party to recognise the government controlled Patriotic Catholic Church and undermine the loyal underground Chinese Catholic Church; too much of a coincidence? It’s time Bergoglio led a penitential procession around Rome's churches to atone for all his heretical mismanagement of the Church. 

Then we have bungling Joe Biden, the leader of the "free world", the person the liberal PC mainstream media will not touch even now after all his incompetent actions. This so-called "devout" Catholic officiated in several same-sex marriages and has been a very vocal supporter of abortion. In recent days Biden and that other so-called "Catholic" American House Speaker Nancy Pelosi vowed to take action against Texas' new heart beat law; for once a heart beat is detected the foetus cannot be aborted. Perhaps we should not be so shocked that the mainstream media is so outraged at the bill. His withdrawal from Afghanistan was the height of incompetence, leaving many at the mercy of the Taliban and at the same time giving these terrorists one of the most well equipped armies in the world - for nothing. In another age Biden would be prosecuted for arming terrorists. 

It's not clear why these long term politicians are so "Woke". It's almost as if they have enacted policies put forward by the left-liberal media, for the media is power. However, now that they have caught up with the media and are leading again, or rather are eagerly jumping over the precipice of ultra liberalism, they are leading the destruction of Western culture faster than the media, who rush to catch up and overtake the government in pushing the whole of society over the edge. Make no mistake: the Main Stream Media, politicians like Biden and churchmen like this pope are destroying civilisation.

Tuesday, 7 September 2021

The 'Vaccine' and the Irish bishops part 3

 

Your excellency, in your statement you write,

 

“The development of a vaccine which is safe, effective, and widely available represents the best chance of a return to normal living, for all of us,” This comes right out of Bill Gates’ note book. With all due respect your excellency it is untrue.

 

Hence the first criterion from Vatican statement is not fulfilled here.

 

There is a grave responsibility to use alternative treatments. This has not been employed. On the contrary, there is much evidence of Big Pharma companies, main stream media (MSM) and governments aggressively using every avenue mostly immoral to suppress, close down, mock and vilify any and every effort of all those, no matter what their vast medical experience, so that they can not promote or manufacture ethical, safe, effective and cheap alternatives to deal with corona virus. In the Vatican alternative treatment is referenced fourteen times. One could ask how could this have been overlooked? Not easily!

Yes, there are alternatives. One of these is Hydroxychloroquine.(HCQ). There have been numerous studies done by various medical professionals who have come up with very good results especially in the early stages of the virus. Take for instance Uganda; in August 2020, it had only 15 deaths from corona virus. They were using Hydroxychloroquine obviously with great effect. The greatest benefit from this remedy is when it is administered in the earlier stages. WHO told Uganda they were to stop using HCQ. Since then there has been a 1200% increase in deaths in Uganda.

Studies have shown that Hydroxychloroquine has reduced the number of persons from being hospitalized by up to 84% when administered with Zinc and Azithromycin. Source: Science direct. Debi Vinnedge to whom the Vatican statement was addressed following her enquiries has stressed,

“we have morally produced treatments for patients who are already infected, notably Hydroxychloroquine or Plaquenils.”

(plaquenils is another name for Hydroxychlorine) Another doctor, Dr Stella Immanuel, said she has treated over 350 patients at the clinic where she works in Houston Texas, Rehoboth Medical Centre. She stated outside the U.S. Supreme court:

“In the past few months, after taking in over 350 patients, we [Rehoboth Medical Center] have not lost one. Not a diabetic, not somebody with high blood pressure, not somebody with asthma, not an old person. We’ve not lost one patient.” Source: American frontline doctors, Whitecoat summit, outside supreme court Washington D.C. 28/07/2020 But the video of Dr. Immanuel testifying to the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine was taken down, censored by Twitter, YouTube and Facebook, and denounced by Bill Gates as “outrageous”. It just so “happens” that Bill Gates is developing a COVID-19 vaccine with German biotech company CureVac, Moderna, GlaxoSmithKline.

Dr Harvey Risch of Yale university has written a paper on defending the use of HCQ; he comments:

“I reiterate: we are considering the evidence for early treatment of high-risk outpatients to prevent hospitalization and mortality. That is it. Treatment starting in the first five days or so after the onset of symptoms. Treatment of older patients or patients with chronic conditions such as diabetes, obesity, heart diseases, lung diseases, kidney diseases, immune-system diseases, survivors of cancer etc. These are the people most likely to die from Covid, and they are the people most needing protection. I have sought to obtain reports of every study of every medication pertaining to early treatment of high-risk outpatients. I monitor the literature daily. And what I have found is actually quite remarkable. What I have observed is that while there have been positive reports about a number of drugs, every study of outpatient use of one drug, hydroxychloroquine, with or without accompanying agents, has shown substantial benefit in reducing risks of hospitalization and mortality.

So what did I find about hydroxychloroquine in early use among high-risk outpatients? The first thing is that hydroxychloroquine is exceedingly safe. Common sense tells us this, that a medication safely used for 65 years by hundreds of millions of people in tens of billions of doses worldwide, prescribed without routine screening EKGs, given to adults, children, pregnant women and nursing mothers, must be safe when used in the initial viral-replication phase of an illness that is similar at that point to colds or flu. In fact, a study by researchers at the University of Oxford showed that in 14 large international medical-records databases of older rheumatoid arthritis patients, no significant differences were seen in all-cause mortality for patients who did or did not use hydroxychloroquine. The Oxford investigators also looked at cardiac arrhythmias and found no increase for hydroxychloroquine users. This was in more than 900,000 hydroxychloroquine users. This is examined at length in my paper in the American Journal of Epidemiology in May…

About studies of hydroxychloroquine early use in high-risk outpatients, every one of them, and there are now seven studies, has shown significant benefit: 636 outpatients in São Paulo, Brazil; 199 clinic patients in Marseille, France; 717 patients across a large HMO network in Brazil; 226 nursing-home patients in Marseille; 1,247 outpatients in New Jersey; 100 long-term care institution patients in Andorra (between France and Spain); and 7,892 patients across Saudi Arabia. All these studies pertain to the early treatment of high-risk outpatients—and all showed about 50 percent or greater reductions in hospitalization or death. The Saudi study was a national study and showed 5-fold reduction in mortality for hydroxychloroquine plus zinc vs zinc alone. Not a single fatal cardiac arrhythmia was reported among these thousands of patients attributable to the hydroxychloroquine.

We have spent the last six months with formal government policies and warnings against early outpatient treatment, with large government investments in vaccines and expensive new treatments yet to be proven and almost no support of inexpensive but useful medications, and a quarter of a million Americans have died from this mismanaged approach. Even with newly promising vaccines, we have almost no information about how they will perform in older and high-risk patients, in whom respiratory virus vaccines are known to have weak efficacy; it will be a number of months before they become widely available; and we don’t know how long vaccine immunity will last, or even if the vaccines will work for the newly increasing mutant strains of the virus. As I have said on many occasions, the evidence for benefit of hydroxychloroquine used early in high-risk outpatients is extremely strong, and the evidence against harm is also equally strong. This body of evidence dramatically outweighs the risk/benefit evidence for remdesivir, monoclonal antibodies or the difficult to use bamlanivimab that the FDA has approved for emergency use authorizations while denying the emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine. This egregious double standard for hydroxychloroquine needs to be overturned immediately and its emergency use authorization application approved.”

Statement of Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD Professor of Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health to the U.S. house senate hearing.

Dr. Lisa Koche, MD, a medical specialist affiliated with St Joseph’s hospital Florida is another doctor who advocates the use of HCQ. She is triple board certified with 8000 patients under her care desiring to give to her patients. She understands over this medication that it is perfectly safe which has been used for the last sixty five years with no dangerous side effects and is now prevented from giving it to her patients because of the banning of HCQ. She recommends that this medication be administered early on, a 200mg dose being given as a preventative against Sars-Cov-2.

Dr Zev Zelenko has been nominated for the Nobel medical prize for his work on Sars-CoV-2 successfully treated 350 patients with HCQ with 100% outcome. He has a common sense approach and he enumerates numerous other treatments for Sars-CoV-2, such as treatment regimens like Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc and Azithromycin. He has said that there are also other approaches such as Ivermectin, steroids, blood thinners that can be utilized against the virus. See: Science Direct, “Does zinc supplementation enhance the clinical efficacy of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine to win today's battle against COVID-19?”

Dr Brian Procter, a board certified physician, has treated over 350 patients within 3 months. He has had a 100% success with his regime of treating patients with HCQ. When treated early there has been no ventilators, no hospitalizations, no ER visits, no cardiac arrests, no side effects,

He proffered the following;

“ if we treat COVID-19 just like anything else we treat (ie, the flu, pneumonia, a sinus infection, hypertension, and diabetes) early and aggressively with a regimen that costs $50 out of pocket or less with 100% success (which is a far better stat than treating all those other conditions), then why is the country shut down and doing social distancing? This political sham must stop.

The American people deserve to know they can go to their regular doctor and get treated early with a regimen that is completely safe and extremely effective, and they do not need to worry about ending up in the hospital and dying. The public is UNAWARE of this, please educate them with the truth. The country needs to return to normal NOW. This is the REAL story. Please feel free to contact me with questions. My heart goes out to all those who have needlessly suffered and continue to suffer during this sham crisis and a disease that is extremely treatable if treated EARLY!!!”

Source, Dr Eowyn, Fellowship of Minds

The number of medical doctors that accept this substance as a safe and effective medicament are too numerous to list here.

Saturday, 31 July 2021

Blasphemy and pornography In the film Benedetta

It is almost impossible to find good pro-Christian mainstream films in modern cinema. In addition, when they do talk about Christianity and especially Catholicism it's either to mock or to disparage and to blaspheme. Pathé's new film Benedetta is a case in point. The film by Dutch director Paul Verthoeven, who has a penchant for sex and violence in his films, carries on down his sordid path and now adds extreme blasphemy to his repertoire of evil.

 

The film is loosely based on a 17th century Catholic nun and mystic who, according to the film, had a lesbian affair with another nun. The film contains lesbian sex, nudity and even the use of a statue of Our Lady in a sexual way! The scenes are so shocking and explicit that some reviewers say it is no more than pornography. And yet it only has a 12 rating, therefore exposing children to homosexual pornography and at the same time smearing Catholicism with its visuals of the 17th century Church using all the cinematic tricks to falsely portray the Church and cause as much damage and hatred as possible. Its director has already been nominated for the Palme d'Or and also of course for the Queer Palm for the film at the Cannes Film Festival.

 

This is pornography writ large, this is hate speech in the extreme, designed to make Catholicism hated and mocked whilst at the same time titillating. It is a nasty exploitive piece of "Gay" propaganda masquerading as truth and art. Please sign CitizenGo's petition to have the offensive scenes removed.

 

Please sign the Citizen Go petition below:

 

https://citizengo.org/en-au/ot/203878-stop-blasphemous-film-benedetta

Monday, 12 July 2021

The Big Gay Hate Machine

The Big Gay Hate Machine
Christian baker Jack Phillips
The LGBT "community" are relentless. They keep coming at you on all fronts and they can be vicious with it; if they are not vicious then they play the victim card. If you push-back and state Christian teachings regarding homosexual acts they label you a hater! Forgetting completely that the actions the so called "Gay" lobby are using are the tactics of hatred. For example, Jack Phillips of the Masterpiece Cake Shop in the USA has been repeatedly taken to court for refusing to bake a cake celebrating anything LGBT; it's not that he will not bake a cake for a homosexual or Trans person, he just will not decorate his cakes with anything celebrating a sinful act whether "Gay" or Trans etc. There were other cake shops around him who did not have a Christian conscience who would have been happy to have baked the "Gay" cake, but the LGBT community want to force him to violate his Christian beliefs or be shut down. So the LGBT community and their supporters have been relentless in their pursuit of him, and with huge funds behind them they are taking him to court again, this time for a "Trans" cake, and hope to get the ruling they want and close him down. Such hatred, such relentless pursuit of an innocent Christian, is breath taking. How do we as Christians respond? It is perhaps all too easy to sink to their level and hate in response but we cannot do this: Christianity is the religion of love. However, what are we talking about when we state this? Our love does not mean we go along with the LGBT demands; no, that would not be love, that would be cowardice. We must stand firm and show these poor souls the truth of their actions and point out that their lifestyles are leading them to damnation. If we fail to do this we are helping them on their way to eternal death, the death that they are living here on earth at this moment and will carry into eternity. Therefore, we cannot bake their cakes, just as they cannot have their cake and eat it.

Monday, 21 June 2021

Advertising has gone totally Woke

 

Mainstream Media Advertising and children's TV have gone totally Woke

Children's TV today!


The big multinational corporations are using openly LGBT themes for their adverts. It appears that nothing is safe from the LGBT appropriations, the word "Gay", the Rainbow, Pride (although pride has always been a sin), and now the whole month of June, all in the name of disordered sexual desires. The advertising world is replete with "Gay" advertising. From Renault to holidays in Spain everywhere there are homosexual themes.

One of the first to use homosexuals in their adverts was the Ikea "Dining Room" ad (in 1994) where two men talk about how great Ikea is for their life together etc. We had the disgusting Cadbury Creme Egg ad before last Easter, where two men eat a Creme Egg between them - at the same time. Cadburys also have the halal symbol on their products. Why do advertisers pander so much to the LGBT minority? The simple reason is that the "Gay" lobby, like the Muslim one, are expert bullies. If they are not bullying they are whining on how hard done by they are. And with the TV for the last fifty years promoting all things homosexual we now have the BBC telling us that "June is Pride month, it is a month dedicated to celebrating the LGBTQ+ communities all around the world". But what is Pride month all about? It's not about love, despite their latest slogan "Love is Love"; it's not about love between a man and a woman, the love that reflects God's love for his spouse the Church. No! It's about lust, disordered sexual activity. It's about the love of sin and pride in sin. The main stream media is ramming this down the throats of everyone and even children - especially children, destroying their innocence and preparing them for a life of sin, brainwashing them to accept and even participate in a dissipated lifestyle.

Children's TV full of LGBT themes

Virtually every TV show now has homosexual, lesbian or Trans characters. They are particularly targeting children, and remember Jesus said "It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin." However, Disney Channel, Nickelodeon, Cartoon, DreamWorks Animation, are deliberately targeting children with explicitly homosexual themes. One Children's cartoon called Blues Clues has a Nora's arch Pride Parade theme with all the animals waving rainbow flags with a song's lyrics sung by a drag queen that go:

 

 “This family has two mommies. They love each other so proudly and they all go marching in ... the ... big parade,”

The TV is worse than ever; children's TV is very damaging to children's innocence PROTECT CHILDREN FROM THE TV, ESPECIALLY SADLY CHILDREN'S TV!

It is our duty as Christians to show the world what true love really is; we must love the sinner but hate the sin - what do we mean by loving the sinner? It must be to come in contact with someone who is living a sinful life to try and help them out of that sin. This is true love, this is love is love, love is not disordered. Love is sacrifice, going that extra mile to save a soul, love is giving, love is a pure heart, for Jesus said “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God."