Barbenheimer

 

Barbie

A new Woke movie to push the message?

 

This is not a review as I've not seen the movie nor do I intend to. However, there are enough reviews and on line talk about the film to know what it's all about.

 

The film stars Margot Robbie as Barbie; in fact all the female characters are called Barbie, it even has a Trans Doctor who is also call Barbie. Ken the male lead is played by Ryan Gosling. The film or at least the first act is shot in a kind of day-glow colour that makes you feel sick, like you’ve eaten too many sweets. (I have seen the trailer and many clips from reviews).

There are a few recurring comments I am seeing so here is a summary.

 

·                     This is not a film to take children to even though it has a PG 13

·                     It is full of adult themed jokes.

·                     It pushes the Woke message very strongly.

·                     It is subversive in that it is jokey, colorful, fun (well sometimes) has song and dance routines, when it doesn't get ugly.

·                     It hates men especially white men.

 

What these film producers, writers and directors need to understand is that white men have a right to exist like everyone else, and they need to be treated fairly like everyone else. There are just too many avenues of Woke opening up and it’s getting past the point when we are just going to accept it all.

 

Summing up - A sickly surreal fantasy that hates the patriarchy and that is full of Woke themes. This is not a children's film, therefore protect your children from it.

 

Barbie is released at the same time as Openheimer; there is a strange meme going around please see the image used in this post. Interesting, what do you think?

 

Sound of Freedom movie

 Sound of Freedom

Why are Hollywood and the Main Stream Media so opposed to this film?

Sound of Freedom is a recently released anti-child-trafficking film directed and co-written by Alejandro Monteverde and stars Jim Caviezel as Tim Ballard. Ballard, who is a former government agent, embarks on a mission to stop sex-trafficking and rescue children from the cartels. The low budget movie has been a surprise success, even knocking the latest Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny off the top box office spot.

So why have Hollywood and the Main Stream Media (MSM) gone into melt down over this film? One would think that they would be applauding this as a bold movie sticking up on the side of innocent children, but no! The Guardian (that Woke leftie rag) called it a "QAnon-adjacent thriller seducing America".  What are they talking about? The same horrid rag's Cuties review was largely supportive of that child exploitive film, so what does that tell us about the Main Stream Media and child sex-trafficking? So we ask you who are the people doing these reviews, what is their agenda? Why do they want this movie to fail so much and why are they so defensive?

Could it be that the film has a strong male lead who is fighting for justice against the cartels who are supplying children to the same woke media who are the recipients of the trafficked children? Hollywood does not want you to watch this movie; why? -  because some, perhaps many there are actually part of the child exploiting ring, they are the last link, the recipients. Their faithful MSM reviewers secretly know this and cover up for them. This is why devout Catholic, Jim Caviezel never gets the big film roles he deserves; Hollywood doesn't want good people.

Young British workers have been killed in the womb since 1968

 Anne Furedi

The squib below, which I do not claim as great poetry! was written recently after listening to Anne Furedi, probably the most notorious name in the British abortion industry, even though she is now retired, defend, promote and extol abortion as a great achievement of women’s autonomy, rights and career ambitions. No mention was made of the rights of the child or, indeed, of fathers. Particularly eye-widening were her admission that the unborn human has special status – but not special enough to save it from convenience killing and her claim that there should be no laws whatever governing abortion (late term abortions being relatively rare could be ignored). She is also on record as defending the killing of young girls in the womb in favour of young boys, if the mother so desires.

   It is the height of tragic irony that the public realm tends to be consumed these days with controversy about the mass immigration being promoted by the current government, indeed by all major political parties, as a solution for the growing shortage of working age people in the labour force. No mention is made that since abortion was legalized “for difficult cases” in 1968 ten million young British workers have been killed in the womb by the moral filth of abortion – thus resulting in the current labour shortages and the rapid ageing of the population.

   “And what goes round goes round”: courtesy of the egregious Matt Hancock, then Health Secretary, abortion during the Covid pandemic was returned to its “roots” when unsupervised home abortion by pills was made universally available – a move carefully orchestrated and acclaimed by the profit-making abortion providers. Inevitably the casualty list of women needing emergency treatment for incomplete or botched abortions has soared. Back street abortion is once more a reality.

   We have ended up in the “civilized” post-Christian position of doing all we can to keep the elderly alive (I write as a 73 year old) and all we can to kill as many young as possible. Is it a surprise that the judgement of God is upon our society?

 

BELATED LINES TO ANN FUREDI OCCASIONED BY HER RETIREMENT AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE BRITISH PREGNANCY ADVISORY SERVICE (BPAS)

 

(Note: Ann Furedi retired as BPAS Chief Executive in December 2020 and is now Vice-Chair of the Governing Body of MidKent College of Higher and Further Education).

 

Since 1968

When killing in the womb

Became a “freedom” thing,

10 million in spate

Young British folk and true

Have fallen to their fate:

And that is why I sing

In praise of Ann Furedi.

 

In 2021

A quarter million plus

Of young in the womb’s spring

Were drugged or knifed to none;

The mothers, fraught, went home,

The slaughter slick and done:

And that is why I sing

In praise of Ann Furedi.

 

A “libertarian,”

Gradgrind in her logic,

The right to keep or sling

One’s child, for her is clarion;

Thus, that boys might live

Girls must become carrion:

And that is why I sing

In praise of Ann Furedi.

 

“The best job in the world”

She called her work at BPAS

Attracting the media’s bling –           

Their approval blatant, pearled,

For “record-breaking growth”

Was hers, a black flag unfurled:

And that is why I sing

In praise of Ann Furedi.

 

Abortion policy,

She’s said, should be a blank,

A Wild West where money’s “ping”

Kills up to birth scot-free.

She’s helped at a late-term killing

Then slept all night like the sea:

And that is why I sing

In praise of Ann Furedi.

 

Well, Britain’s millions short

We’re told of working folk,

But that’s abortion’s sting –

There’s pint where should be quart:

At MidKent now, Mère Ann

Tempts the young to abort:

And that is why I sing

In praise of Ann Furedi.

 

And what goes round goes round:

Home aborts by pill –

What joy, the postman’s ring! –

Bring back to its old ground

Death with its cramps and blood –

Back street killing is crowned!

And that is why I sing

In praise of Ann Furedi.

 

And so, the self-demise

Of the West’s Christian fact

To which so few now cling

Results in Ba’al’s flies

Crawling the newborns’ faces           

Exposed under pagan skies:

And that is why I sing

In praise of Ann Furedi.

 

by Prayer Crusader St Cecilia

 

Shame Month No 4

 'We're coming for your children'

With Shame month in full swing and many pundits wishing it could be extended to incorporate the whole summer it still surprises me how children are treated in all this. For no 'Gay Pride' march or event seems to be complete without children present to witness it all. It's all very blatant, naked men twerking in the direction of spectator families, men and women in various states of undress with outlandish clothes that accentuate the sexual aspects of their being. Sometime they even chant 'We're coming for your children.' Trying to persuade us that they simply want to own the phrase and they are just being ironic or something, therefore for us to suggest that they want your kids is yet another example of 'Straight' right wing hate speech. But actually they are telling the truth, hiding explicitly in full view! They DO want your children, they want them corrupted, transitioned and fully functional objects for their pleasure.

However, is there finally a fight back happening? - with news that Target (the giant American retail corporation) which has just lost about half its market value following boycott calls over its Alphabet People friendly kids clothing. Virtually all their stores were almost completely full of Rainbow themed "Pride" clothing, flags and objects. But the object that broke the family camel's back was the 'Tuck friendly' swim suit for boys. This suit looks like a girl’s full bathing costume in Rainbow colours that has a tuck area around the male genitals so that he looks like a girl. There followed an angry social media campaign calling for a boycott and for once it was successful, people did stop going to Target stores. Not that other stores don't sell this type of Alphabet People clothing; it's just that Target went too far.

Bud Light the American beer is another example of people finally having enough. After having hired the Trans 'woman' Dylan Mulvaney, to star in a video advert for the beer there was a massive backlash and the customers of the beer suddenly stopped buying it. This cost Bud Light $27 billion and now they are even trying to give their beer away, with rebates of $15 on each pack. Yet this is still not enough for the CEO to say he will never hire Mulvaney in an advertising campaign again; is he just too afraid of vicious Woke attacks? The pro-Gay/Trans lobby is just too powerful; they have academia and the media on their side. Therefore, they control both sides of the brain. None the less, as we have always said at CUT, the real Trans-phobic, Homophobic or whatever, are people that are too cowed, too brainwashed by the Rainbow Alphabet people to speak out and say the obvious: -  that homosexual acts are sinful and against natural law, and as for drugging and mutilating sexualised children in so called gender affirming ways ... this is plainly evil.

Incidentally Dylan Mulvaney is now identifying as a lesbian! And the Target designer is said to be a Satanist!

By Prayer Crusader St Philomena

Shame Month 3

 

A demonic perspective

 

In the last few years of her life, St. Catherine of Siena, who lived in fourteenth century Italy, carried on a long “Dialogue” with God, which she dictated to scribes and which has been preserved and can be read to this day in print and digitally.

In Chapter 14 of this Dialogue God makes clear to her something about the nature of demons. Demons are fallen angels, chief among them Lucifer, who rebelled against God and was thrown from Heaven in consequence (see Revelation Chapter 12). As such, they are and remain pure spirits without the bodily, material existence of human beings, animals, and all the world of ‘things’ in which we spend much of our lives.  This gives them (the demons) a perspective on certain ‘sins of the flesh’ which may be surprising.

Speaking of ‘that cursed unnatural sin’, God in St. Catherine’s Dialogue says:

But the stench displeases not only Me, as I have said, but the devils as well, those very devils these wretches have made their masters. It is not its sinfulness that displeases them, for they like nothing that is good. But because their nature was angelic, that nature still loathes the sight of that horrendous sin actually being committed. It is true that it was they who in the beginning shot the poisoned arrows of concupiscence, (sexual desire) but when it comes to the sinful act itself they run away.    

The ‘unnatural sin’ is not named, but it is further specified in the Dialogue that God told St. Catherine:

‘It is so hateful to Me that for this sin alone five cities were struck down by My divine

judgment.

1) Sodom

2) Gomorrah

3) Admah

4) Zeboiim

5) Zoar

For My divine justice could no longer tolerate it, so despicable to Me is this abominable sin. But the stench displeases not only Me, as I have said, but the devils as well, those very devils these wretches have made their masters. It is not its sinfulness that displeases them, for they like nothing that is good. But because their nature was angelic, that nature still loathes the sight of that horrendous sin actually being committed. It is true that it was they who in the beginning shot the poisoned arrows of concupiscence, (sexual desire) but when it comes to the sinful act itself they run away.

Thus, in St. Catherine’s view, the demons may be pleased that “Gay Pride Month” is being celebrated; but they will be turning their backs on the actual sins which it celebrates.

By Prayer Crusader, St Theresa of Avila

Shame Month No 2

 

The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence.

The media treat Catholics and other Christians differently to anyone else; they will not see our side of anything. When other groups or cultures are insulted they take it upon themselves to show support and empathy. However, this is not the case with Christianity and especially Catholicism.

A good case in point is the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. They are a group of Queen and Transgender who mimic and mock nuns. The hideous Guardian takes them seriously and calls them an "order" of queer and Trans nuns! See how the main stream media join in the mocking of real Catholic nuns by promoting them. They have been in the news recently because the L.A. Dodgers (a baseball team) asked them to headline their Pride event on June 16^th; then, because of a backlash from the team of largely Catholic Hispanic support, disinvited them; only to get an even greater media-supported push back in the opposite way, when they re-invited them.

The Dodgers have stated:

"We have asked the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence to take their place on the field at our 10th annual LGBTQ+ Pride Night on June 16th. We are pleased to share that they have agreed to receive the gratitude of our collective communities for the lifesaving work that they have done tirelessly for decades.

 "In the weeks ahead, we will continue to work with our LGBTQ+ partners to better educate ourselves, find ways to strengthen the ties that bind and use our platform to support all of our fans who make up the diversity of the Dodgers family."

However it's not just that this anti-Catholic hate group mock nuns and the Catholic church with their outlandish versions of nuns’ habits. They also engage in a blasphemous form of pole dancing, whereby one "sister" represents the crucifixion by hanging on a cross while another climbs up and pole dances with him on this live crucifix!

The US Conference of Catholic Bishops has called for prayers of reparation.  “We call on Catholics to pray the Litany of the Sacred Heart on June 16, offering this prayer as an act of reparation for the blasphemies against our Lord that we see in our culture today,” the statement read. We ask all members of CUT to please join them in praying the liturgy of the Sacred heart in reparation for this outrage.

Shame month No 1

 

Gay shame month series

Phillip Schofield

It is the charge of all Christians to be charitable; we cannot attack people simply because they are living sinful lives or have views that are contrary to Christianity. However, it is also vital for a Christian to keep the faith, we must be careful that we show true charity to all. However, sometimes true Christian charity can be mistaken for meanness or rigidity when it is actually doing what's right, sometimes known as tough love; it is the pointing out with charity when someone is living a bad life or holding evil views. Sadly this hardly ever happens. A case in point was the "coming out" of ITV's This Morning presenter Phillip Schofield.  For when he said he was "Gay" virtually everyone rushed to show him support, for example:

"Huge respect and admiration for our friend Schofield ," tweeted fellow ITV presenters Ant and Dec. "Sending love to you P, and your 3 lovely girls ❤️."

CUT comment - How can Ant and Dec tweet they have respect for someone with a wife and family, and give support to someone who is engaging in sex with someone other than his wife, let alone with another man, it’s crazy. And what about this:

"Takes a lot of guts to do this, not least when you're a very public figure and know it will all be dissected in a very public way," said Good Morning Britain host Piers Morgan. "Sending my very best to Schofe and his family."

CUT comment - A lot of guts!-  that's ridiculous! The world is on the side of Homosexuals and the Alphabet people, so where is the bravery here? What would take "guts" these days is to say that Schofield was very wrong.

It now appears that he is in trouble for having an affair with a younger member of staff at ITV while still married to his now ex-wife Stephanie Low. Well it strains credulity that this was not happening for him to come out in the first place. So what do people think, that he would come out as Homosexual when nothing is happening? in fact many media outlets are saying that Schofield groomed a much younger man (some outlets say age 15), although Schofield has denied this.  The point we are making here is that the so called "Gay" community is given the support of their lifestyles when those who try and point out the evil of their ways are called homophobic. However, as we have also said at CUT, the true homophobic are those who rush to the support of anyone who comes out - they are so afraid of being labelled Homophobic that they are in fact homophobic.

By Prayer Crusader St Philomena