Part Four - Pope St Uriah Heep

The Babylonian Captivity of the Papacy

Part four - The Judas Pope.

With all the recent exposés and scandals one would think the media would really be on the back of the Church and especially the pope now. After all when Benedict was pope they did just that, relentless programming on anything to attack the Catholic Church. From condoms to abortion and our "uncharitable hateful" teachings on homosexual acts to our hateful history re the Crusades, the Inquisition etc and how bad these events were (never talking about how both these events saved Christendom). But No! Even though we are now finding out about just how many homosexual child abusers there are in the priesthood and epically post-pubescent boys, not a peep, why? The answer is very simple: why attack your own, this pope is one of them, a homo-friendly media personality, just like nearly all in the media and the vast majority of the population at large.  Remember what Francis said on the plane back from Ireland when asked about Archbishop Carlo Vigano's revelation that even though Pope Benedict sanctioned the homosexual predator Cardinal McCarrick – he, Pope Francis, let him back. Here is the question and answer:

Anna Matranga, CBS: Good evening, Holy Father.  I’ll return to the subject of sex abuse about which you’ve already spoken. This morning, very early, a document by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano’ came out. In it, he says that in 2013 he had a personal talk with you at the Vatican, and that in that talk, he spoke to you explicitly of the behaviour of and the sexual abuse by former-Cardinal McCarrick. I wanted to ask you if this was true.  I also wanted to ask something else: the Archbishop also said that Pope Benedict sanctioned McCarrick, that he had forbidden him to live in a seminary, to celebrate Mass in public, he couldn’t travel, he was sanctioned by the Church.  May I ask you whether these two things are true?

Pope Francis:  I will respond to your question, but I would prefer last first we speak about the trip, and then other topics.  I was distracted by Stefania, but I will respond.
I read the statement this morning, and I must tell you sincerely that, I must say this, to you and all those who are interested.  Read the statement carefully and make your own judgment.  I will not say a single word about this.  I believe the statement speaks for itself.  And you have the journalistic capacity to draw your own conclusions.  It’s an act of faith.  When some time passes and you have drawn your conclusions, I may speak.  But, I would like your professional maturity to do the work for you. It will be good for you. That’s good. (inaudible)

It is clear that Francis is saying that he is relying on the media not to make too much of a fuss about this. And of course because this is homosexual in nature - they will not! This is because there is a Babylonian captivity of the papacy. A captain of the Babylonian media empire recently visited the pope. He is Bono, the leader of Irish rock band U2 (who came out strongly in favour of abortion during the Irish referendum, did the pope talk to him about that as he should have?). Nothing wrong with the pope meeting celebrities of course, but when this Babylonian infiltrator who had done much to corrupt Ireland comes out of the meeting with Francis talking about his "One" foundation uniting with Francis' Church you know something else is going to go wrong with the papacy. One what? One world government, One Religion etc etc. Is One's mission to deal with extreme poverty a front as so little of its funds actually goes to its cause? Bono during a U2 concert last year dedicated a song to his "old friend" Cardinal McCarrick! Just how close was Bono and the Cardinal?

One - Bono and Pope St Uriah Heep
"Hey...Judas!!!" 

I firmly believe that the acceptance and continued growth in all things homo-centric and LGBT will bring Western Civilisation down; maybe not now, but in a few decades. How long did Rome take to fall? A century or so? It took Christianity to resurrect Western civilisation, but it took centuries.

The media itself is full of course of post-pubescent boy abusing predator homosexuals and they pass it off as love - "Boy Love" as they call it in the "Gay" mags (you see for yourself if you're unfortunate enough to come across them on line). However this is where the Church needs to step up to the mark, tell the truth, even if we are called the dreaded word  homophobic. You know what? I don't care, being labelled thus its a badge of honour.

How to spot a corrupted or bad priest or Bishop.

It's really quite simple. Has your priest or bishop been talking about the loss of family values in society, using the gospel sermon to give  every day advice and logic when confronted with the vast wasteland that modern society has become, has he spoken out against homosexual acts, or abortion and contraception? Or has your priest talked relentlessly about mercy but has never spoken about justice? You can't have one without the other. Therefore you only have a half Christian priest or bishop not a full one.