Another
treatment offered by medical professionals is ivermectin
Drs
Paul Marik and Pierre Kory founders of the group Front line covid critical care
alliance (FLCCC alliance) have been promoting ivermectin which is normally used
for parasite infestations of the body. They have been having promising results
with this drug.
Marik “the
Eastern Virginia Medical School professor and doctor goes on to review four
clinical studies (also chronicled by TrialSite) including Mahmud, Rajter, Kahn,
and Gorial and performs what he describes as a “meta-analysis” with mortality
as an endpoint. He argues that the results indicate a “highly significant
reduction in mortality.” Trialsite news
Last month Dr. Kory and his team testified
before the U.S. Senate Homeland Security Committee in favour of authorizing
ivermectin, a Nobel Prize–winning
anti-parasitic agent, for early treatment of the novel coronavirus. In his impassioned presentation, Dr. Kory
explained that ivermectin “basically
obliterates transmission of this virus,” with “miraculous effectiveness.”
Ivermectin
has been the subject of dozens of studies and anecdotal success stories since
it was found to reduce COVID-19 in a laboratory last June.
“I've been treating COVID pretty much
every single day since the onset,” Kory said at the December hearing.
“When I say ‘miracle’ I do not use
that term lightly[.] ... [T]hat is a scientific recommendation based on
mountains of data that has emerged in the last three months.”
Such
data emanates from places like India, the second most populated nation in the
world, which embraced the treatment protocol advanced by FLCCC, and has watched
its case and fatalities rate drop in “steep decline.” Though India has four times the population of
the U.S., it has less than half of the coronavirus related deaths. Source LSN
According to Dr Ryan Cole,
Medical Director of Cole Labs, who says, four billion doses of Ivermectin have
safely been taken. With Ivermectin the death rate decreased 70-90% in hospitals
treating COVID-19 patients.
The American National institute
of health (NIH) has been implacably against this drug. One wonders why?
Remdesivir
another drug on the market shows effectiveness against sars-cov2, the New
England journal of medicine reports on trials of Remdesivir shows that it was
better than placebo and shortened hospitalization time and also reduced
respiratory tract infections.
The Medical Express reports on a 31
year old man who was quite ill with a rare genetic disorder which prevented him
from creating immune antibodies and contracted the sars-cov2:
“Dr. Nicholas Matheson from the Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic
Immunology and Infectious Disease (CITIID) at the University of Cambridge
added: "Our patient's unusual condition gave us a rare insight into the
effectiveness of remdesivir as a treatment for coronavirus infection. The
dramatic response to the drug—on repeated challenge—suggests that it can be a
highly effective treatment, at least for some patients."
The team further suspect that
remdesvir is likely to be most beneficial when administered early in infection,
before the virus is able to trigger a potentially catastrophic immune response.
They say that the course of their patient's disease also underscores the
important—but often conflicting—roles that antibodies play in protecting us
from infection.
"The fact that our patient was
unable to fight off the disease without treatment suggests that antibodies
contribute to the control of SARS-CoV-2," explained Dr. Matthew Buckland
from the Department of Clinical Immunology, Barts Health, London. "But
this lack of antibodies may also have prevented his COVID-19 from becoming
life-threatening, because he had no antibodies to trigger a damaging immune
response.”
Prelimininary tests by Gilead the
drug manufacturers have shown in a phase three simple trial, “Among severely sick people, the antiviral
drug reduced the risk of dying by 62 percent compared with standard care,”
Which of course requires to be
confirmed in clinical trials.
Other
trials have found the same results such as that among severely sick people, the
antiviral drug reduced the risk of dying by 62% compared with standard care,
Dr Kathleen Mullane of Chicago university, an infectious disease
specialist, has said good things about it. On studies she has done on it she
has stated that most of the patients under her care were severely ill with
sars-cov2 but with treatment with the drug they were able to go home within six
days and only two had died.
Remdesivir has also shown good results in many animal studies and shown
that it can prevent and treat sars-cov-2, and mers.
One wonders why the WHO have
said they do not recommend this drug.
Tocilizumab has also shown promising results especially in people who
are in the severely ill category. In one trial in India one doctor had this to
say,
“The trial's lead co-author, Professor A. V.
Ramanan from the University of Bristol's School of Clinical Sciences, and
Consultant Paediatric Rheumatologist at Bristol Royal Hospital for Children,
said: "Our study suggests tocilizumab might still be effective in patients
with severe COVID-19 and so should be investigated further in future studies.
It adds to existing evidence from the RECOVERY and REMAP-CAP studies which
demonstrate that tocilizumab does have a significant impact on reducing mortality
in those with COVID-19 requiring oxygen or being ventilated. After
dexamethasone (steroids), this is still the most significant advance in the
treatment of COVID that has an impact in reducing deaths." Source (Medical
Express March 8th 2021)
There are also ongoing trials with many
other drugs that have not used murdered babies to obtain them.
Why would the relevant Government agencies be
downplaying the potency of these very apt medicines and nature’s own immunity
and healing properties? Might it have something to do with the fact that these
agencies cannot legally allow on to the market an experimental vaccine where
there is already a known treatment.
Hence the response to the Vatican statement where it
states: “Therefore, doctors and fathers
of families have a duty to take recourse to alternative vaccines… there is a grave responsibility to use
alternative vaccines.” This is not
being adhered to and also falls at this fence.
Conscience
The recent statement from the Vatican following on
from the 2005 statement states,
“Due to the situation of the ongoing
pandemic, “all vaccinations recognized as clinically safe and effective can be
used in good conscience with the certain knowledge that the use of such
vaccines does not constitute formal cooperation with the abortion from which
the cells used in production of the vaccines derive.”
In assessing the ethics and the morality of a vaccine
one criterion is whether the vaccine is more dangerous than the disease? Well I
must say personally I have not the slightest fear of the novel coronavirus.
Let’s take a look. Surely one should
weigh up the matter. Bishop Doran, you may have been influenced by Pope Francis
when he said “we must take the vaccine. “ When he was interviewed on the
Italian news media he said,
"If the doctors are presenting
this to you as a thing that will go well and doesn't have any special dangers,
why not take it?"
These are serious words coming from the
pope, one wonders if he has done any research.
