Catholic Teaching and the 'Vaccine'
·
From Prayer Crusader St Rita to the Irish Bishops
Greetings
in our Lord Jesus Christ,
Sometime ago you made a statement on
receiving the corona virus, sars-cov-2
‘vaccine’. In your statement on the experimental vaccine, though not saying
it outright, it was certainly implicit that everybody including Catholics,
should take the vaccine. From the moment the covid farce 19 news started
hitting the airwaves it was clear that there was something amiss with this
whole thing: the stoking of fear, of mis-information, of dis-information, of
censorship of information, of the abuse of power of some holding an alternative
agenda. This has continued on, unabated, even intensified since March 2020. I
hope in this letter to show you that I respectfully disagree with you and why I
disagree with you.
Your
statement, as you say, is based on the statement made by the Vatican on Dec
2020, which drew from the statement from the Pontifical Academy of Life 2005,
in a reply to Ms Debi Vinnedge who enquired as to the use of aborted babies’
remains in the Rubella vaccine. You may also be alluding to the statements made
by the English and Welsh bishops made also in Dec 2020 where they selectively
quote from the 2005 Vatican statement. The document from the pontifical academy
2005 is a fine document up to the point where, after finding that even though a
vaccine has fetal remains in it, the writers state that it is wrong and then
conclude that it is still ok to receive the vaccine.
“,
the use of vaccines whose production is connected with procured abortion
constitutes at least a mediate remote passive material cooperation to the
abortion, and an immediate passive material cooperation with regard to their
marketing. Furthermore, on a cultural level, the use of such vaccines
contributes in the creation of a generalized social consensus to the operation
of the pharmaceutical industries which produce them in an immoral way.”
So
how they got from saying this to saying it is morally acceptable is difficult
to see. Be that as it may, even if we take this at face value we shall have a
look at the taking of the sars-cov-2 experimental vaccine according to the
points set out in the Vatican statements.
Firstly, this statement by the
Vatican is not a magisterial document. It is a body which can even have
non-Catholic people working in it. It is not a sacred Congregation. So a
Catholic is not bound by this statement.
"The fact of the matter is, pontifical academies are very low in
the scale of authority and even non-Catholics can be members. (And as it
happens Some are and have even made pro-depopulation statements), It's not a Sacred Congregation that has papal
authority when upholding the perennial Magisterium Hence, its document on
vaccines can be viewed as an informative opinion piece, nothing more.” ( Deacon Nick Donnelly)
So a Catholic is not bound by this
statement.
Even
if we are to accept this Vatican statement let’s have a look at it and to see
if according to its stipulations, it is ok to take experimental gene altering
experimental therapy.
The
first stipulation it makes is,
“If persons are exposed to
considerable dangers to their health, vaccines with moral problems pertaining
to them may also be used on a temporary basis.”
Well
is there a considerable danger to health?
We are told to look at the science and the science emphatically says,
NO. we are not exposed to considerable danger. Numerous eminent physicians and
medically related specialists have stressed this to be so:
“the odds of the average
person (unvaccinated) in this study cohort being hospitalized is 1/17,511 or
0.006 percent. The odds of such a person developing mild COVID, simply cold or
flu symptoms, is 162/17,511 or 0.9 percent.
These are the odds of the average
person coming down with COVID and are quite low. Is this worth shutting down
large swaths of the economy for? Have we ever done that for seasonal flu?
If you look at the entire study
population of about 35,000, this many individuals would need to be vaccinated
to keep one person out of the hospital. And that one would likely recover.
That’s what the vaccine provides.”
Dr
Brian Joondeph M.D., American thinker magazine commenting on FDA report on the
Pfizer vaccine of 44,000 participants.
Dr Martin Feeley, clinical director of
the Dublin Midlands Hospital Group, has stated:
“The
number of deaths among recent cases is less than one in a thousand. This data
reflects a disease much less severe than the average annual flu,”. (Source, Digital Desk staff)
A
group of over 200 German and Spanish doctors have set up an international
investigation into Covid-19, called ‘The Covid-19 Extra-parliamentary
Committee‘.’ They have stated ‘We don’t
need to be anxious about covid-19 because it’s no different to the seasonal flu
that we have every year.’
Source,
Europe reloaded
A group of doctors from Spain have
got together to refute the disinformation surround covid. They have stated:
We say to
citizens: don’t be afraid, this virus is benign unless you are part of the
at-risk populations. If the TV channels do the same thing with the flu, the
numbers will be much higher than for the coronavirus! On average, television
will report an average of 3 million cases and 2,000 deaths from the flu every
day. And for tuberculosis, television will report an average of 30,000 cases
and 5,000 deaths every day. The flu virus infects 1 billion people every year
and kills 650,000, and tuberculosis infects 10.4 million people every year and
kills 1.8 million. Doctors for
truth, (Source, Europe Reloaded.)
From an epidemiologist on the
irrationality of reaction to covid,
“I have never seen anything like
this, anything anywhere near like this. I’m not talking about the pandemic,
because I’ve seen 30 of them, one every year. It is called influenza… But I’ve
never seen this reaction, and I’m trying to understand why.” —Dr Joel Kettner, professor
of Community Health Sciences and Surgery at Manitoba University, Medical
Director of the International Centre for Infectious Diseases;
If we dissect the World Health
Organisation’s (WHO) own statements it can be seen that covid isn’t is in line
with flu deaths. This is what Kit Knightly has done,
It’s a good expose and I will
Dr
Michael Ryan has stated that about 10% of the world has been infected with
covid on oct 5th 2020, trying to frighten us, the death toll then
was just over 1,061,539 and the media used this to scare us and governments
used it to justify lockdowns. The world has 7,800,000,000 on the planet which
makes the covid death rate 0.014 which is the same as influenza rates which is
24 times lower than the WHO’s estimates of 3.4 % last March. Though this was
used by the media to scare us. Did no-one in the media do the maths, they
obviously didn’t want to. If we do the maths it should re assure that there is
no deadly pandemic but scaremongering and grist for the mill for the media
baying for lockdowns and leading to government capitulation to placate the
media which led to severe lockdowns and disruptions of people’s lives. And now
to experimental vaccines
Dr Roger Hodkinson is a
virologist, a Pathologist and was chairman of the Royal College of Physicians,
Canada’s pathology committee, and is the chairman of a Biotechnology company in
America. He had this to say on governments’ and media’s response to the so
called deadly pandemic,
“The
bottom line is simply this: there is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven
by the media and politicians. It’s outrageous. This is the greatest hoax ever
perpetrated on an unsuspecting public. There is absolutely nothing that can be
done to contain this virus, other than protecting older more vulnerable people.
It should be thought of nothing more than a bad flu season.”
“It’s politics playing medicine and
that’s a very dangerous game.”
“Masks are utterly useless. There is
no evidence based for their effectiveness whatsoever. Paper masks and fabric
masks are simply virtue signalling.”
“Social distancing is also useless
because Covid is spread by aerosols which travel 30 metres or so before
landing. Enclosures have had such terrible unintended consequences. Everywhere
should be open tomorrow.“
“Using the province’s own statistics,
the risk of death under 65 in this province is 1 in 300,000. You’ve got to get
a grip on this. The scale of the response that you’re undertaking with no
evidence for it is utterly ridiculous.”
Doctor
Roger Hodkinson.
Dr Simon Thornley a Public
Health Physician, lecturer and researcher in the section of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics states that covid is not much more serious than flu. He quotes
the Ioannidis study done at Stanford university which states the same. He is
also supported by
“The Ioannidis study shows the death rate (for COVID-19) is only very
marginally worse than the standard flu viruses that kill hundreds of sick and
elderly New Zealanders every year.”
Simon
Thornley, senior lecturer in epidemiology, University of Auckland. September 6,
2020. He is part of COVID Plan B, a group of six academics including three
health science lecturers. The group has called for an end to COVID-19
lockdowns, arguing the risks of the virus have been overstated and lockdowns
are more harmful than the virus itself.
To be continued...
